When it comes to Brexit, One of the more perceptive commentators around is Rafael Behr. So it is worth considering the following remark:
For the true believers, a good Brexit is one that keeps the grievance alive; that makes foreigners the scapegoat for bad government; that continues to indulge the twin national myths of victimhood and heroic defiance. Measured for that purpose, Johnson’s pointless Brexit is perfect.
The Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) is designed as an ongoing negotiation, with five-yearly reviews and I have tended towards the view that now Brexit is “done”, the whole issue can be toned down somewhat. The TCA framework can then be used to allow Britain to make the best of a bad deal by slowly and quietly re-aligning itself with the EU.
But what if I’m being overly optimistic here? What if the TCA turns out to be the start of a lengthy deterioration in relations. If the Brexiters continue to be unable to get over the fact that they have now achieved everything they demanded, we could all be looking towards endless and escalating confrontations.
That said, it’s only a month since the transition arrangements came to an end. I can still hope that people become bored enough of the whole mess that no-one wants to hear the Brexiters any more. And, once the process becomes as dull as it should be, things can start to improve again.
But it may be worth preparing for the worst.
2 thoughts on “The Grievance Machine”
I was reading that the wine Exporter trade body had really had a go at the government for wrecking there business. Best thing was the government had claimed to have worked with them but no one at the trade body could remember even one phone call.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That doesn’t surprise me at all.
Comments are closed.